We Hope for What We Do Not See

“We hope for what we do not see,” said the Apostle Paul, meaning our hope is against all evidence to the contrary.  And as Bill McKibben and Diana Butler Bass say in her meditation today, it amounts to saying. “I told you so,” with a sense of despair. [https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#search/diana+butler+bass/FMfcgzGtwMWhTCVFXqdglHsWkXgTFRQZ]. The result of all the writing and preaching they did was exactly what they warned against. But there is no satisfaction in saying, “I told you so.”  The climate is hotter. The churches are hemorrhaging membership.  It only means your hope for a change was dashed.

Is this what Jesus was saying in the Garden of Gethsemane when he prayed, “if it is possible, let this cup pass from me”? Was it the suffering or rather the actual despair that all he had gained would be lost. The approving crowds would turn against him, the religious establishment would carry out their betrayal, the disciples would scatter, he would be alone. Weren’t his final words, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”  It was the loss of all he had achieved that was symbolized in the “cup” that would “pass from me.”

It is much easier to read this story backwards and say,” Jesus, you’re going to triumph in the end,” but Jesus had only the human perspective in that moment. Maybe he had hope, but it was the “hope for what we do not see.” It was hope against all evidence of failure. Jesus faced the specter of failure in his final days, as many of us do. We hope only for what we do not see.

Luke says, “And being in anguish, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was like drops of blood falling to the ground” (Luke 22:44). That was true despair. So much like the world, as Paul says, “the whole creation has been groaning in labor pains till now, and not only the creation, but we ourselves, groan inwardly while we wait for adoption, the redemption of our bodies ( Romans 8: 23).

Jesus knew failure, so do we.

We hope for what we do not see.

I made a career of recruiting and inspiring young people to teach literacy. During my 25-year career as a teacher educator, many of them inspired me with their determination to “make a difference.”   But the beginning of a teaching career is usually fraught with disappointment, because somehow kids are not as taken with Robert Browning or Langston Hughes as you were. And the principal packs your classroom with students, too many to personally attend to them. And kids disappear for a month and return to your classroom saying, “Did I miss anything?”  And the book you thought would make a difference, The Absolutely True Story of a Part-time Indian (Sherman Alexie) was removed from the curriculum, because of the chapter on masturbation. And suddenly Co-vid.

It is all too much for too little. In a recent study of interest and recruitment of good teachers, Matthew Kraft and Melissa Arnold Lyon revealed, through surveys and interviews, how students have indicated less interest in teaching in the last decade:

Interest in the teaching profession among high school seniors and college freshman has fallen 50% since the 1990s, and 38% since 2010, reaching the lowest level in the last 50 years. The number of new entrants into the profession has fallen by roughly one third over the last decade, and the proportion of college graduates that go into teaching is at a 50- year low.The Rise and Fall of the Teaching Profession,”

All the hallmarks of this failure have followed me into retirement. The cause I believed in has become a lost cause.  It is not even the doom this pronounces on public education that disturbs me, it is the loss of the desire “to make a difference.” So few dream the dream. So few hope.

I am still far from Gethsemane, but there is a feeling of wheels falling off, dreams de-railed.

Jesus knew failure, so do we.

We hope for what we do not see.

 

 

 

 

Who Wants to Be a Teacher?

The “Blueprint” for the St. Louis Public Schools has the usual institutional worry about logistics of buildings closing and opening. It is not misguided but superficial. The quality of public education has always been about the quality of teachers, and it is a problem St. Louis shares with every urban school system in the United States. We are entering a crisis of lack of new, skilled and committed teachers in the profession.

In a recent study of interest and recruitment of good teachers, Matthew Kraft and Melissa Arnold Lyon reveal, through surveys and interviews, how students have indicated less interest in teaching in the last decade:

Interest in the teaching profession among high school seniors and college freshman has fallen 50% since the 1990s, and 38% since 2010, reaching the lowest level in the last 50 years. The number of new entrants into the profession has fallen by roughly one third over the last decade, and the proportion of college graduates that go into teaching is at a 50- year low.The Rise and Fall of the Teaching Profession,”

Teaching has recently suffered losses from its ranks during Covid, but the prestige of the profession has been declining for the past decade and longer. Some of the reasons identified by Kraft and Lyon are “education funding, teacher pay, outside opportunities, unionism, barriers to entry, working conditions, accountability, autonomy, and school shootings.”

The problem of loss of prestige most often cited by students is lack of pay. Missouri has addressed its low ranking for teachers’ salaries by minimum pay increases to $38,000 per year, but to no benefit for St.Louis teachers, whose average minimum is $44,000.  Urban schools require higher salaries to attract teachers to schools where conditions may be problematic.  So St. Louis teachers need more competitive minimum salaries.

Lacking that, there are ways to attract teachers to urban schools.

  • A national movement called Grow Your Own (GYO)  attempts to “draw teacher candidates . . . from the local community. The hope is a community member will be more personally invested in the school system, and more likely to stick around. Drawing teachers from the community also makes it easier for students to see themselves and their life experiences reflected in their teachers.”  Incentives may include college scholarships, mentoring programs for teacher candidates, and job shadowing of good teachers.
  • Schools in Jackson, Miss., have partnered with the Mississippi Department of Education to provide candidates with a no-cost master’s degree and dual certification in elementary and special education. In return, the new teachers promise to stay and teach in Jackson for three years. https://www.npr.org/2023/03/23/1164800932/teacher-shortages-schools-explainer
  • Professional Development Schools. This is an institution from the 1990’s that died for lack of funding. Classes in teaching were taught in fully-operating public schools where the gap between theory and practice was constantly challenged. Student teachers could come back to the methods classroom declaring, ” I tried this method and this is what happened.” Clinical professors would engage on the subject of what should happen vs. what works.  It would all occur within the same building, just a few doors away from the actual classroom with real students.  It was clinical education following the model of teaching hospitals. [https://online.suny.edu/epn/developing-a-professional-development-school-pds/].

The Professional Development School worked most effectively in small, under-enrolled schools, which makes St. Louis an ideal candidate.  Universities that prepare teachers must initiate the program by hiring or devoting faculty to clinical teaching in the schools. Teacher education professors would have to commit to a learning-by-doing methodology. In the public schools teachers would have to allow observers and conversations about how to improve teaching.

A significant by-product of Professional Development Schools is kids in schools get to see teachers in the making. They can see a community (university and K-12 teachers) devoted to excellence in teaching and see a bright career path.  The Professional Development School is challenging to set up, but the benefit is a cultural change in teacher preparation.

Improving public schools requires more than keeping the seats filled and the buildings maintained. It takes a village and generous funding to make a teacher, but good teachers are essential to school reform. When young people stop seeing the benefits of a career in teaching, there is serious disruption of the supply chain, to borrow a crude metaphor. It will take a community of teachers, teacher educators and determined public officials to make teaching an attractive career option for the next generation of teachers.

 

 

The Politics of Regulating Local Schools

The tools of bureaucrats are like the proverbial hammer looking for a nail to pound.
Politicians, like Governor Ron DeSantis, think they can solve local education problems with their executive hammer and tongs, pounding the local curriculum into their ideology. Most recently the revisions concerning the effects of slavery on African Americans have drawn fire.
Local school districts, like the Miami-Dade County Board, pushed back against the Florida’s regulation of curricula, Steve Gallon of Miami-Dade protested,“We’re talking about education.”
There’s no margin of error to plant seeds of disinformation and misinformation. There’s no margin of error to plant seeds of believing that in some shape, form or fashion, that one of the most horrific crimes known to mankind that was levied against people based on the color of their skin, brought some silver lining. [https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/college-board-pushes-back-florida-work-group-member-likened-new-black-rcna97525]
School districts within states and across the country are too varied to submit to state and federal regulation of their curricula.

If we were to examine the recent testing report of the National Assessment of Educational Progress by state, we would find astounding variations. The average national proficiency rate of fourth graders in Math is 35%. The highest state proficiency rate belongs to Wyoming at 44% and the lowest state proficiency rate is New Mexico at 19%. Can you imagine applying the same school reforms to Wyoming and New Mexico?  https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/profiles/stateprofile?chort=1&sub=MAT&sj=&sfj=NP&st=MN&year=2022R3.

If we compared proficiency scores by neighborhoods (which NAEP does not) within New Mexico and Wyoming, we would be astounded at the range of differences within each state. Every school district has unique problems, one of which could be bad testing conditions.

Schools have unique needs for improving student attendance, for recruiting non-white teachers, for attracting bi-lingual teachers, for professional development in teaching math or social studies, for after-school remedial programs, or for expanding home teaching programs and Broadband access. Programs are as varied as the schools they benefit.

The need for ethnically diverse, highly qualified teachers towers over the varied educational landscape. Highly-paid white female teachers can be recruited by the most successful schools. Bringing Black male teachers into the urban environment is more problematic. Creating incentives for career teaching is more challenging than recruiting teachers for 2-3 year stints, as Teach for America did. We need young, diverse, committed, and persistent faculty for the next generation. The state and federal government could create those incentives with aid to recruit targeted teachers and support mentoring programs.

Teachers need long-term incentives to work in the most needy schools, incentives like loan forgiveness, like effective mentoring programs, like pay to underwrite costs of graduate school, pay to address student-based learning obstacles during the summer. Do all schools need these benefits? Of course not. No need to re-invent the wheel at schools in the upper 25% of test performance. Target the aid where and how it is most-needed.

State and federal curriculum tampering will never improve the effectiveness of local education.  The best function of remote governments is to incentivize local programs with strategic funding: to attract new teachers, public relations to highlight local successes in achievement.

Education needs less politics, not more. Conservatives should remain true to their principles and support incentives at the school district level, not meddle with their curricula.  And if they can create incentives for new teachers to work where they are most needed, then they will have made a national contribution to local reform. The answer is to scorn the “one-size-fits-all” mentality and target funding where and how it is needed.

Middle School Malaise

The recent report of declining test scores among middle school students has alarmed parents and educators about the loss of in-class instructional time during the pandemic years. The details of that NAEP score decline are reported in the June 21 edition of the New York Times, among other media outlets.

[https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/21/us/naep-test-results-education.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20230621&instance_id=0&nl=breakingnews&ref=cta&regi_id=58015410&segment_id=136280&user_id=c0905f751b354fe438caeb62c91726b3]

More concerning, the overall trend of testing by the National Assessment of Educational Progress over the years prior to the pandemic shows a regular decline, as noted in the Times article:

Performance has fallen significantly since the 2019-2020 school year, when the coronavirus pandemic wrought havoc on the nation’s education system. But the downward trends reported today began years before the health crisis, raising questions about a decade of disappointing results for American students.

The decline of Math and Verbal scores could be influenced by many factors. One cause echoes the seclusion of the corona-virus: chronic absenteeism, which also deprives students of the physical community and the facilities of the school. Chronic absence from the building where crucial learning takes place might be a reason for declining test scores both during the pandemic and before.  Without the peer and teacher reinforcement, the responsive approach to learning, the technology used to reinforce learning– all that is offered by attending school–students who are chronically absent miss the assets of in-person learning.

In the statistics provided below, chronic absence is defined as missing 10% of school days or more in a school year. Here are the most recent data for chronic absence:

Percent of Students Chronically Absent (Chronic Absence Rate)     Number of Chronically Absent Students
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21    2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
US TOTALS 12.8% 16.0% 16.2% 11.9% 20.5%   6,479,434 8,095,132 8,171,271 6,043,980 10,100,372

Compiled by “Attendance Works,” an attendance-compiling study that highlights the effects of absenteeism on test results.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OEyUeswKs0lAMrWZaRbTX1rNEvWab-jI/edit#gid=1510369153

These figures indicate that as many as 8 million students (16.2%) have been chronically absent in an ordinary year, with 10 million chronically absent during the throes of the corona-virus. Those numbers of chronically absent students could easily drive down average test scores. The compiler of these statistics, “Attendance Works,” also highlights the public to research showing the academic impact of chronic absenteeism. (see https://awareness.attendanceworks.org/wp-content/uploads/Research2016.pdf).

Poor attendance is sometimes the elephant in the room when teachers and administrators discuss academic performance, because they assume that the responsibility for attendance is outside their control, more a function of family and student attitudes toward education. Sadly, some parents may send their children to school only to qualify for entitlement benefits,  which require a periodic “present” at school during the academic year. Such attendance has no benefit to education.

Schools are not helpless to improve attendance, even though students are motivated by their upbringing and home support to attend schools. “Attendance Works” identifies five strategies to address faltering school attendance, including “Programatic Responses” that the school can implement once the causes have been identified:

Identifying the barriers to attendance can indicate the appropriate solutions, whether that involves, for example, establishing uniform closets, improving access to health care, launching walking school buses, providing tutoring, offering mentoring, developing morning or after school care and other approaches. https://www.attendanceworks.org/chronic-absence/addressing-chronic-absence/strategies-for-school-sites/

Without getting into the weeds of school-specific solutions, the programs recommended by “Attendance Works” are practical to implement, if a school can devote or acquire resources to address the chronic absence problem, but it is a uniquely community-based problem.

Chronic absenteeism can be a consequence of poverty and broken families, along with the individual motivation of children to attend school. It is a community problem, best solved by the collaboration of social agencies within a community. Everything from transportation to public recognition can affect school attendance.

With the ability to offer virtual attendance, schools may have provided students and parents the motivation to miss in-person schooling to accommodate family needs, such as baby-sitting younger siblings, working full time to support family income, or avoiding problematic interactions at school.  Parents might consider virtual schooling a convenience that fits their life-style.

But the evidence of testing at the middle school level over the past decade confirms that learning outside of school is not a good option for adolescent students.  Motivation to learn is seldom enhanced outside of the school building, even if some students have been shown to thrive there. Participation in the school community increases motivation to learn and provides the individual reinforcement most students require in the middle years.

Virtual learning is mostly effective for students already motivated to learn. Consistent in-person attendance is the first step along the learning curve for most middle school students. School leaders and parents should resolve to keep students attending in person to preserve the valuable physical community of schools.

 

What Did We Get for our $100,000?

George Will continues his crusade against progressivism in academia in The Washington Post by pointing out how the college degree is worth less, because 38% of recent college graduates hold jobs that “do not require a college degree.” That statement does not reflect whether college graduates are preferred by employers or whether there are attributes of college graduates that make them more desirable as employees.

You have to acquire a college degree to teach in a public school, but you may not need one to work as an administrative assistant in a company with gross revenues of $1 million/ year.  However, businesses may prefer college graduates because of their communication skills, including the ability to understand a novel audience. College graduates understand the significance of their audience in ways that those who have only communicated with their family and friends may not.

Another skill that comes from a general college education is the detection and correction of bias or prejudice in written or spoken speech.  This is more than asserting “political correctness,” as right wing commentators call it, but understanding how language reveals an individual’s opinions of other races, religions, genders, or social classes.  Some people rightly take offense to being called “girl” or “boy,” because it shows disrespect. College graduates understand that language matters, and not only for the thin-skinned who take offense at everything.

Mr. Will objects to how history is taught in universities: “a prolonged indictment–ax-grinding about the past’s failure to be as progressive as today’s professors.”   This complaint suggests that our present condition is not influenced, for example, by the original slavery of, and economic prejudice toward, the Negro race.  Past indictments may illuminate present conditions. I’m sure Will would agree with the much quoted warning of Santayana, Those who forget their history are condemned to repeat it. Otherwise why do we study history at all?

Mr. Will objects to a study of literature “that is mostly about abstruse literary theories–‘deconstruction,’ etc.?”  Actually deconstructing language is a very modern skill necessary for studying social media. Deconstruction is a way of understanding how something was created, usually things like art, books, poems and other writing. Many readers of Facebook and Twitter posts take language at face value, and that is a problem, because they should understand how writers make use of words like “woke” or “globalism” or “diversity” rather than how the dictionary defines them.

Will’s problem is his higher education is private school-centered, where the most expensive, exclusive, politically-correct, and arcane literacy originates. In fact, students attending publicly-funded universities outnumber those attending privately funded universities 3 to 1. [https://educationdata.org/college-enrollment statistics#:~:text=73.0%25%20of%20college%20students%20at, graduate%20students%20attend%20public%20institutions]. Students at publicly-funded universities are more likely to get a workplace-oriented education, because employment is more often the goal rather than graduate school admission.  The academic setting imagined by Will is a private university where the majority of graduates go to graduate school. Yet private school enrollees represent only 25% of the university population.

But whether you go to graduate school or right into the workforce, as a c0llege graduate you have received training in that elusive notion “critical literacy.” College educators characterize it in various ways, but here is one:

When students examine the writer’s message for bias, they are practicing critical literacy.[3] This skill of actively engaging with the text can be used to help students become more perceptive and socially aware people who do not receive the messages around them from media, books, and images without first taking apart the text and relating its messages back to their own personal life experiences.[2][3]

It is not a course in literacy, but an attitude toward literacy that is lacking in many of those who missed college. It is both a skeptical and constructive stance toward reading and viewing that makes college graduates less subject to indoctrination.  Although critical literacy is taught in secondary school, not everyone gets it, because students are often co-dependent on their teachers.  Independent thinking is not always advocated in high school and even when it is, students are too grade-driven to take the risk of disagreeing with the teacher. That sophistication often develops in college, and critical literacy is the best reason for going to college, as a culmination of education.

George Will’s concept of a college education is too much driven by economic goals and political correctness. He needs to get out more and meet some graduates of our public post-secondary institutions, instead of following the headlines.  The reputable state universities (and some private colleges) are focused on the thinking that matters in the workplace, in the community, and on social media. The rest of the academic uproar over political correctness is only a distraction for the 75% who attend public universities.

 

 

 

 

 

Revisionist Dreams

“The past is never dead. It’s not even past, ” said William Faulkner. He meant the past lives in the present. There is still contempt for people of other colors, still resistance to racial cohabitation in classrooms and neighborhoods, still schemes for denying some people the privilege of voting, still disregard for the over-representation of gun deaths and medicaid expirations among people of color.  It’s because so many privileged people believe that the past is over with, and the present should display America in the best light, the light that Makes America Great Again.

In the iconic news photo  Elizabeth Eckford attempts to enter Little Rock Central High on  September 4, 1957. If you were a news witness to this event 66  years ago you remember the agony of school integration and the suffering of the Black pioneers entering white public spaces for the first time in the Deep South.  Maybe you were one of those who broke the color barrier against inhumane harassment.  Little Rock Desegregation 1957.jpg

Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders is a white graduate of Little Rock Central High School who has emerged a victor in Arkansas history.  “I’ll never forget being a student at Little Rock Central High and watching my dad, a Republican governor, and Bill Clinton, a Democrat president, hold open the doors for the Little Rock Nine, doors that 40 years earlier had been closed to them because they’re Black,” Huckabee Sanders said in a campaign ad.

When American history is taught, what version should our children learn?  The version told of the white hate that almost stopped the integration of Little Rock Central High School or the version, which is a memory of the Little Rock Nine willingly returning to the scene of their pain and persecution during Sarah Huckabee’s blissful high school years?

The suffering of the Civil Rights movement is what Huckabee Sanders wants to forget and what some will call “critical race theory,” because it makes us focus on moments of prejudice and incivility.  The airbrushing we do to make history a patriotic lesson is what some partisans like Governors Ron DeSantis and Sarah Huckabee Sanders expect to see in the school lessons of American history K-12.

It is the airbrushing of slavery as career development that the Florida Board of Education wants to institutionalize in the public schools.

An infamous 1950 textbook by Samuel Eliot Morrison and Henry Steele Commager said:

As for Sambo, whose wrongs moved the abolitionists to wrath and tears, there is some reason to believe that he suffered less than any other class in the South from its ‘peculiar institution.'” (The Growth of the American Republic)

Perhaps one of the most egregious Lies my Teacher Told Me (James W. Loewen, 2018 ), but consistent with the narrative of American history textbooks that assures high school students that our history has been nothing but progress. Until the 21st century this narrative has contributed to glaring misrepresentations and omissions of our history in our textbooks that have come back to haunt us in the public spectacle of white domination in the killing of George Floyd. What we have forgotten or never knew about racism has to be re-taught to a shocked classroom of white citizens.

Scenarios like this remind me most of present-day Russia, which is trying to restore its past by invading Ukraine. In the minds of some Russians the Soviet Union once ruled Europe through its satellites, which we called the Iron Curtain countries. But the Russians remember them as a Pan-Slavic union, uniting people of similar faith and political allegiance.  They, too, want to make the crumbled Soviet Empire “great again.”

To sell his ambitions in Ukraine Vladimir Putin has to reframe the post-World War II occupation of Eastern Europe as a willing alliance of  diverse nations, some of them unable to hold themselves together within their own borders. When we refer to the “Iron Curtain,”  the Russians claim we make “revisionist history;” they don’t admit their own version of the Soviet Empire is revised to their satisfaction.

We want a revisionist history in our country, where the old days of civil struggle and inequitable voting and living conditions did not matter if you were white.  We remember a country that matched our limited version of democracy, and we disapprove of anyone who remembers without revisionist glasses.  We call those people “woke” or “haters” of America.  They are killers of the dream of democracy for our kind of people.

When we remember the Civil Rights Movement, we are asked to remember the day the Little Rock Nine returned to Central High School, and they were honored as if we had never screamed at, or spat on them. That was not a good memory. So revisionists think about the outcomes of the struggle, not the struggle itself, that martyred and traumatized so many. They congratulate themselves for their enlarged hearts and forget that the past is not dead.

It is not even past.

 

 

 

 

 

Workers for the Harvest

The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few; therefore ask the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into his harvest. (Luke :2)

When Jesus uttered these oft-quoted words, he was in the midst of sending out seventy disciples to “every town and place where he himself intended to go.” In other words, these were “front men,” people hired to attract the crowds to the public teaching of Jesus.  I think of these people today as those called to service careers, where their primary mission is to touch those who have primary needs of safety, education and health.

In  education the enrollments in teacher preparation programs across the nation are 33% down. This suggests an impending shortage greater than the current one in which

the researchers estimate that there are more than 36,500 teacher vacancies in the nation. They also estimate that there are more than 163,500 positions filled by teachers who aren’t fully certified or are not certified in the subject area they’re teaching.  https://www.edweek.org/leadership/how-bad-is-the-teacher-shortage-what-two-new-studies-say/2022/09

The pandemic has been blamed for a teaching exodus, but the truth is that teaching just doesn’t attract young people as it once did, due to lack of adequate salary and benefits, as well as public attacks on local schools.  I could see this decline even in 2017, when I retired from teacher education.  The kind of teaching skills required today include technology for Zoom interactions, special education for students entering the mainstream, and cross-curriculum familiarity to integrate the humanities, a sophistication that a primitive teacher preparation program, such as “Teach for America,” cannot provide, and entry-level salaries cannot fairly compensate.   Teachers cannot afford to take the necessary 160+ additional credit hours needed for such preparation, for which the national average entry level salary is around $40,000/ year.

Healthcare has also faced a major exodus at a time when the demand for healthcare workers is skyrocketing. The healthcare sector faces a labor shortage, with most workers being overworked due to the pandemic. The Department of Commerce projects a severe lack of physicians, nurses, and health workers.  The stress of the pandemic has driven hospital workers out of the profession, but the demand for these professions continues to be exacerbated by a rising aging population in the United States, initiated by the Baby-boomers, but perpetuated by the increasing lifespan of Americans.

Public safety does not appear among the lists of job shortages, but it is worth noting that the St. Louis police force is down 250  officers at a time when increased lack of presence of patrol-men/ -women on the street is considered a public danger. The entry-level pay for the St. Louis police force is $50,615.

Most urban police forces lack adequate staffing of professionally trained officers.  The mere presence of patrol-people on the street is considered a crime deterrent in a time where urban crime is a major election issue.  So the need is critical and the supply is diminished. Teaching, healing and public safety are the work of laborers of the harvest, in  Jesus’ terms. You cannot work in these professions without a sense of calling, because the salaries cannot compensate for the daily challenges you face. You discover the soft underbelly of human suffering and the hard edges of addiction which demand discipline, patience and kindness, traits that sometimes come from training, but more often come from dealing with the hostility and the suffering that you “can’t pay me enough to do.”

Since these professions are always underpaid, the workers need to be called and committed to a life of service. You can argue that all professions require “service” of some kind, but not all professions are so underpaid for such extended hours and stress. Possibly the leisure and hospitality professions also provide a woefully underpaid service, and they also are losing employment at two times the national average.

What all these understaffed professions require is the call to be “laborers in the harvest.”  The labor is underpaid and the workers under-appreciated. Check any day’s headlines and see if one of these professions is not under attack, because those who expect to be served are not feeling adequately served. So there are weak incentives to enter the work unless as a “higher calling.”

I pray that the Lord of the Harvest will send these laborers. Unless the next generation of qualified workers hears the calling, we are facing a painful decline in our care industries and a coarsening of our lives. These jobs are not for the faint of heart or the materialistic . They are for those who still believe you can be called to a career and who are ready to accept they can’t be financially rewarded enough for their life’s work.

 

 

 

Indoctrination in and out of School

The Encyclopedia Britannica gives a lucid definition of “indoctrinate:” : to teach (someone) to fully accept the ideas, opinions, and beliefs of a particular group and to not consider other ideas, opinions, and beliefs

The word “indoctrinate” has become a buzzword for Republican candidates for describing how the history of race is taught in public schools.  The very word “indoctrinate”describes what politicians and campaigners do when they lay that claim against teachers. They ask their listeners “to not consider other ideas and beliefs” when they accuse teachers of doing the same.

Meanwhile the Missouri State Social Studies Standards take great pains to require a process of study that includes thinking for yourself, not to indoctrinate, but to

•Ask questions: Why? Why there? Why then? What is the impact of…? What is the real story of…? What is the significance of…?•Develop compelling questions and research the past.•Anticipate and utilize the most useful sources to address their questions.
•Develop and test claims and counter-claims to address their questions.
•Take informed action based on their learning.
This is what teachers mean by “critical thinking:” looking at the options and selecting what makes the best sense according to each student’s learning and experience. Every public school teacher in every subject is taught to make this process available to students at whatever level they are capable of understanding it.
Does this sound like “indoctrination”? Because “critical thinking” is what public school teachers are required to teach, not “indoctrination.” If indoctrination takes place in any public school classroom, it is by rogue teachers.
On the other hand, when you examine the requirements of right-wing educators, it sounds very much like “indoctrination.” In the critique of the Florida Board of Education on the Advanced Placement Exam on African American Studies, the Board did not ask for a balanced presentation of topics for the AP Exam. Rather they wanted the topics eliminated from the actual content of the exam, so they would not be considered unless in a final research paper, where students choose their own topics. As the Washington Post reported on the AP curriculum after the AP Board heard from the Florida Board of Education.
In its revised 234-page curriculum framework, the content on Africa, slavery, reconstruction, and the civil rights movement remains largely the same. But the study of contemporary topics—including Black Lives Matter, incarceration, queer life, and the debate over reparations—is downgraded. The subjects are no longer part of the exam [emphasis mine] and are simply offered on a list of options for a required research project. And even that list, in a nod to local laws, “can be refined by local states and districts.”
When you subtract certain topics from the AP Exam, you can be sure those topics are not covered in any depth in an AP course. The curriculum fails to consider the topics “Black Lives Matter, incarceration, queer life, and the debate over reparations” at all, as though they did not matter to African American Studies. This is true indoctrination, where students are exposed only to non-controversial topics, the topics one political group approves of.
When you subtract parts of African American Studies from its official curriculum in the Advanced Placement Exam, you leave teachers no choice but to indoctrinate, to give an approved view of the curriculum. So what right wing educators and parents oppose is not indoctrination, but teaching what they disagree with, even to Advanced Placement students, who are expected to think critically even to pass them AP exam.
And to say that students have the liberty to study these topics in their research papers means only that students can investigate topics they are already familiar with, without having taken “African American Studies.”  Most students will investigate what the topics of the class inspire for further study. If the topics don’t arise in the regular curriculum, most students will not be motivated to study them independently.
The word “indoctrination” is tossed about carelessly in the campaigns of right wing politicians. If we listen carefully and think critically, we will notice that they want their political views taught in the public school curriculum and not the political views of their liberal counterparts. That is the very definition of “indoctrination.”  That is not at all what high school social studies standards require, but it is what certain politicians hope you will allow them to do to you.

An Enforced Public Fast

Morality is a personal choice, as Jesus argues in his teachings. Through discipline, some Christians try to awaken morality in themselves during Lent.  It is enough to commit to disciplines before God. It is too much to enforce them on others. That is the overreach we are witnessing in the Missouri legislature and in the State Board of Education in Florida, an overreach that is un-Christian and undemocratic.

The season of Lent turns some Christians into abstainers or observers of new disciplines.  Giving up alcohol would be an obvious one.

The real test, however, is to abstain without recognition and without self-appointed sainthood, the kind of holiness Jesus advocated when he preached: “And whenever you fast, do not look dismal,  like the hypocrites, for they disfigure their faces, so as to show others they are truly fasting. Truly I tell you they have received their reward. But when you fast, put oil on your head and wash your face, so that your fasting may be seen not by others, but by your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret, will reward you” (Matt 6:16-18).

After two thousand years Christians still resist the discipline to abstain in silence.  It was once popular in my former church to ask before Ash Wednesday, “What are you doing for Lent?”  The Jesus-sanctioned reply should have been, “None of your business,” but I never thought of that.

Christians want others to recognize and, even better, share their abstentions. They create laws that compel others to “fast” the same way they do.  The demand for a universal abstinence motivates the impending legislation in Missouri to compel public librarians to defend their book choices and the demands of some state Boards of Education to eliminate systemic racism from the Advanced Placement curriculum.

In Missouri we anticipate the legislature drafting a bill that enacts Jay Ashcroft’s proposal to require public librarians to submit lists of books and their rationales for their selection or lose state funding.  When Ashcroft first invited public responses to his proposal, he received 20,000 pages of reactions. The majority opposed the proposal, according to Ashcroft’s office. As the proposal becomes a proposed law,  it receives the scrutiny of the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. That committee might also invite public reaction, but it may forgo the embarrassment of an aroused public.

That’s because no one wants to fast alone. If we abstain from “prurient” reading, as Ashcroft calls it, we want everyone else to abstain as well. It is not enough to keep your children from reading objectionable books, you have to keep other children from reading those books. Public librarians are being compelled to keep those books away from all children.

In the true spirit of Lent, Christians should adopt their own standards of moral literacy without enforcing them on others.  No doubt this is what St. Paul meant by his charge: “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind” (Romans 12:2).   The “renewing of your mind” suggests that morality is a private matter, not something we enforce on others. Christians are still trying to wrap their minds around that message.

The same moral conflict motivates some legislators to control the message of the curriculum of African American Studies. The curriculum, as first drafted in April 2022, contained topics that have been marginalized in the current version, published in February, 2023.  According to the Washington Post, “An April update paired ‘systemic’ with discrimination, oppression, inequality, disempowerment and racism. A December version said it was essential to know links between Black Panther activism and ‘systemic inequality that disproportionately affected African Americans.’”

That application of the word “systemic” has been eliminated following a critique of the Florida Board of Education. The Advanced Placement Board claims that its edits were internally driven, not in response to Florida state educators.

When a curriculum suggests that racism is more than a personal choice, it invites a critique of our system of governance, a critique that some politicians have called “critical race theory.” Clearly the AP curriculum of three months ago was inviting a critique of a system that first allowed slavery, then practiced discrimination in the Jim Crow laws, then restricted the right to vote for another century. Why this should not be called “systemic” racism is a mystery. Our system permitted civil rights violations of some form for three centuries, yet the historical commentary on this has been called “indoctrination.”

This loaded word “indoctrination,” has made it appear that teaching about “systemic racism” was the same as compelling students to believe one theory over another. But the elimination of language from a curriculum is no different than indoctrination, because it compels students to believe that racism is merely a personal choice, that our system did not reinforce prejudice by keeping Blacks from voting from the Civil War until 1964.

In the original version of the AP curriculum, the word “systemic” was mentioned nine times. In the current version, not at all. Eliminating controversial topics from a curriculum is a white-washing of flaws that were built into our laws and practices for most of our history, but the Florida Board of Education wanted that word stricken from the ultimate goals of African Studies in secondary school. When you strike a viewpoint from an advanced curriculum, a curriculum for seventeen-year-olds, that is indoctrination.

When those who call  themselves Christians demand the indoctrination of high school seniors to their “personal choice” view of racism, they compel all society to their Lenten fast.  It is not enough that they define racism for their own conduct, they define it for everyone else.  It is not only anti-Christian to enforce moral standards on others, it is also anti-Republican in the sense that personal freedom should not be curtailed.

It is enough to commit to disciplines before God. It is too much to enforce them on others. That is the overreach we are witnessing in the Missouri legislature and in the State Board of Education in Florida. It is un-Christian and undemocratic.

 

CRUCIAL REVISIONS

The frequency of key words, phrases and names in the course plan for AP African American studies shifted significantly from April to February.

WORDS               APRIL 2022      FEB 2023

Black Panther/s                23                           18

Intersectionality              19                               1

Malcolm X                         16                              18

Reparations                      15                                1

Incarceration                   15                                1

Womanism                       14                               0

Systemic                              9                               0

Martin Luther King Jr.  9                             17

Intersections                     8                               1

Movement for

       Black Lives                  6                               0

Kimberlé Crenshaw        5                               0

Black Lives Matter           3                               1

Obama                                  3                               3

Black conservatives/ism    1                            1

Queer                                         0                           0

Colin Powell                            0                           3

Gay                                             0                            2

 

 

Critical Republican Theory

“History is written by the victors” can not be attributed to Winston Churchill, even if we want him to have said it.  It is a perfectly good example of how history is not always what we want it to be. We have our favorite version that validates all that we believe in, but there are other versions that could challenge our view of who we are. This is the historical theory that Republicans are attacking when they fume about Critical Race Theory.  They cannot accept the view that history is often written by the victors.

Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders would be an example of a white graduate of Little Rock Central High School who has emerged a victor in Arkansas history.  “I’ll never forget being a student at Little Rock Central High and watching my dad, a Republican governor, and Bill Clinton, a Democrat president, hold open the doors for the Little Rock Nine, doors that 40 years earlier had been closed to them because they’re Black,” Huckabee Sanders said in the ad.

“Good triumphed over evil,” Huckabee Sanders continued. “This is who we are.”

That, in two sentences, is the Critical Republican Theory of History (CRT).

“Good triumphed over evil. That is who we are.”

And we can be proud of that progress without forgetting the history of where we came from. How do Black citizens remember Little Rock Central High School?   When they look at the bronze memorial of the “Little Rock Nine” [https://www.littlerock.com/little-rock-destinations/testament-the-little-rock-nine-monument] they probably remember the photo of Elizabeth Eckford surrounded by angry white citizens as she makes her way toward the high school, September 4, 1957.

But on the first day of school, a mob of furious white people assembled to make sure they couldn’t get in. The black students had trained for this moment. But nothing could prepare Eckford for the screaming, taunting crowd that surrounded the school. They called out for her to be lynched and yelled slogans like “Two, four, six eight, we don’t want to integrate!” In the midst of the horde, reporters and photojournalists recorded the chaos.

Our collective memories of that day are tainted by the image of Eckford, surrounded by angry white people, walking in dark glasses and a white dress on a journey that she could not complete that day.

An alternate-angle view of Elizabeth Eckford on her first day of school, taken by an Associated Press photographer. Hazel Bryan can be seen behind her in the crowd.

An alternate-angle view of Elizabeth Eckford on her first day of school, in a photo taken by an Associated Press photographer. Hazel Bryan can be seen behind her in the crowd. (Credit: Bettmann/Getty Images)

No one is proud of this day in history, whether Black nor White. That doesn’t mean we should turn it into a bronze rendering and forget the ugliness of that day.  That doesn’t mean we should ignore the shame we do feel for an ugly day in our history. Remember the shame and be proud of the progress. We can do both. You can hold pain and joy in the same hand. That is how history is recalled.

With Critical Republican Theory (CRT) we are supposed to remember our accomplishments, but not our shame. We are afraid to see the dark moments of our past in any detail, because they mar the “greatness” that is America. You can not construct “greatness” with a flawed history, Critical Republican Theory believes.

The same selective approach to history has been applied by Governor DeSantis to the Advanced Placement curriculum in African American Studies. After examining the outlines of the curriculum the Governor declared:

This course on Black history, what [is] one of the lessons about? Queer theory. Now, who would say that’s an important part of Black history, Queer theory? That is somebody pushing an agenda on our kids.

Governor DeSantis spoke from a depth of ignorance about a curriculum developed by specialists in Black Studies. How do you think about Black Studies in the 21st Century without mentioning James Baldwin, Alice Walker, Lorraine Hansberry, and Audre Lourde, all gay writers?   Is it any coincidence that the civil rights of gay citizens are under fire today as Black citizens were fifty years ago?  Governor DeSantis and the Florida Board of Education tried to dictate how Black Studies is taught across the entire country by attacking the modern civil rights of LBGTQ contributors to the Advanced Placement curriculum.

Since then the College Board published their updated version of the African Studies curriculum. According to the New York Times:

In its revised 234-page curriculum framework, the content on Africa, slavery, reconstruction, and the civil rights movement remains largely the same. But the study of contemporary topics—including Black Lives Matter, incarceration, queer life, and the debate over reparations—is downgraded. The subjects are no longer part of the exam, and are simply offered on a list of options for a required research project. And even that list, in a nod to local laws, “can be refined by local states and districts.”

This year Little Rock Central High School is piloting the same course in AP African American Studies.  Arkansas Governor Huckabee Sanders on Jan. 10, her first day in office, issued the executive order that has since prompted Arkansas Department of Education leaders to ask the New York City-based College Board — the maker of the course — for information on its content.

[DOCUMENT: Read African American Studies – PILOT COURSE GUIDE » arkansasonline.com/201history/]  

Ruthie Walls, a veteran Arkansas social studies and economics teacher as well as a former charter high school director, told the Central High School Tiger newspaper this week that the course that she is teaching “does not violate … the executive order by any stretch of the imagination.””

In email responses to questions from the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Walls said it is “of vital importance to teach” the history course because students want to learn the information, and it helps students be well-informed and able to think critically.

This struggle of history educators against the white governors of southern states illustrates how sometimes “History is written by the victors.”  No one wants to believe that, but the active revision of the Florida Board of Educators of the AP curriculum suggests that the power of white victors still has sway over the record of history.

 

 

 

 

Bottom row (L-R): Thelma Mothershed, Minnijean Brown, Elizabeth Eckford, Gloria Ray; Top row (L-R): Jefferson Thomas, Melba Pattillo, Terrence Roberts, Carlotta Walls, Daisy Bates (NAACP President), Ernest Green, 1957. (Credit: Everett Collection Historical/Alamy Stock Photo)

Bottom row (L-R): Thelma Mothershed, Minnijean Brown, Elizabeth Eckford, Gloria Ray; Top row (L-R): Jefferson Thomas, Melba Pattillo, Terrence Roberts, Carlotta Walls, Daisy Bates (NAACP President), Ernest Green, 1957. (Credit: Everett Collection Historical/Alamy Stock Photo)

Bottom row (L-R): Thelma Mothershed, Minnijean Brown, Elizabeth Eckford, Gloria Ray; Top row (L-R): Jefferson Thomas, Melba Pattillo, Terrence Roberts, Carlotta Walls, Daisy Bates (NAACP President), Ernest Green, 1957. (Credit: Everett Collection Historical/Alamy Stock Photo)