The Enigma of Tears

This “way of tears,” and the deep vulnerability that it expresses, is opposed to our normal ways of seeking control through willpower, commandment, force, retribution, and violence. Instead, we begin in a state of empathy with and for things and people and events, which just might be the opposite of judgmentalism. It’s hard to be on the attack when you are weeping.  Richard Rohr, The Tears of Things.  [https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?pli=1#inbox/FMfcgzQZTVqLvmFmqMWXXGJnlRTsrSGf]

I look forward to reading Richard Rohr’s new book Ther Tears of Things, because I frequently don’t understand why I am crying. It is sometimes sadness, sometimes grief, sometimes joy, often unidentifiable. I do understand that tears bring relief and should not be dreaded.

Tears are sometimes a release from anger. I cannot stop being angry about the chaos, the ruthlessness and the loss of people’s jobs since the last election. It is anger about what I cannot control. Then suddenly I wept one day, and the tears felt cleansing. The next day I was angry again. Finally I had insulate myself from the news, except for one hour per day. I recommend PBS for this purpose, because they dive into the “why” of the news, and it almost makes sense.

I found two birthday cards a week ago on “Blue Mountain” (https://www.bluemountain.com/). I was helping Victoria select one for a family birthday. As I was previewing the first one, I began to weep, as if it had some significance for me, but it was a cheerful, even humorous, card. When I showed her the second card, I felt nothing. When Victoria selected the first card, I said, “This one is making me cry,” but I could not say why. It did not make me feel sad or happy, but I was moved just the same. I sometimes have these moments, when I cry for no apparent reason.

They say old men are more prone to tears, because their inner resistance has weakened, but maybe we just have more memories to elicit tears. Singing in church, I am sometimes moved to tears, but cannot tell why.  When I sing “Great is Thy Faithfulness” I most always remember that it was my mother’s favorite hymn. She has been gone twelve years now. Am I still mourning or does her memory give me joy? We also  sang it at my wedding to Kathy in 1974. That was fifty years ago. Am I singing the joy of that day or her death in 2016?  Tears are complex as we age.

Just about every movie about teaching makes me cry; I am a career teacher. To Sir, With Love (1967) was one of the reasons I went into teaching, because the teacher was a savior figure who struggled with kids from London’s lower classes. In the end they loved him and composed a song that sang his praises. That worn-out classroom plot gets me every time. I can’t say I ever redeemed a hopeless class in my twenty years of high school teaching. Still I cry for Mr. Holland’s Opus (1989), Lean on Me (1989), Dead Poet’s Society (1989), Dangerous Minds (1995),  and Freedom Writers (2007), all telling the same teacher-as- savior plot that has begun to lose its credibility[ https://www.aarp.org/entertainment/movies-for-grownups/info-2021/inspirational-films-teachers.html].  

When I began to teach teachers I warned my novice teachers that they should aspire to lead (education =  “lead out”), rather than make friends, as the movies may portray teaching. Students are not inherently bad, but if they can undermine classroom stability, they will. You can make friends after you lead.  With all my worldly knowledge of the classroom, if you roll out a movie of a teacher winning his classroom against all odds, I will cry like a baby.  Later I will tell you that the movie makers know nothing about real teaching.

After I first met my present wife I was weeping all the time. I wrote poetry and had long phone calls.  I hate phone conversation. Somedays I would be crying before breakfast.

Previously I had a successful marriage with my late wife of 42 years, but I was overwhelmed at this second chance at marriage. Perhaps I had never expected this opportunity, yet I already knew the perils of married life. I had lived the discord as well as the dream. I knew about how parents interfere. I had lived through illnesses and drag-down fights.  I was not an infatuated teenager. I knew it was from joy, but did I imagine marriage would be bliss the second time around? Apparently. Still weeping at 70.

I no longer dread tears in myself or in others.  I have never seen a person who was harmed by tears. Tears may express fears and loss, they may come inappropriately, they may  cause others distress, but they are usually good therapy, good transitions or helpful discoveries.  You can learn from tears, but don’t always expect a lesson.  They have a life of their own, and they don’t want to explain themselves. They are what they are, despite what your psycho-therapist says.

I cry, therefore I am.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jupiter and Beyond

RoomWe landed on the shores of Lighthouse Cove, Jupiter FL on Tuesday evening and began a week on the east coast of Florida at a “Unique and Charming–Waterfront Studio Cottage”seen at right. Tight, but comfortable quarters with a Murphy bed* and a bathroom as tight as the head on a one-cabin cruiser.

Here’s the view of Lighthouse Cove at twilight:

The weather has been a steady 60’s and 70’s. Florida is just as billed.

Could get used to this.
Wednesday we saw the Launch of SpaceX IM (Intuitive Machine -???)
Planned launch time was 7:07 p.m. After a countdown of two and a half hours, it launched rather suddenly and shot off the platform much faster than I remember the Saturn and Mercury shots.  We sat in bleachers with about three hundred of our closest friends. Locals have advised, correctly, I think, that an equally spectacular view is available on Cocoa Beach nearby, and for a lot less money.  Still, pretty awesome.
Less spectacular, but more fun, in my opinion, the Cardinals playing the Marlins Thursday at home in Roger Dean Stadium and yesterday the Astros away in Cacti Stadium. Don’t ask about the name “Cacti.” No sense whatsoever, especially when the Astros and Nationals play in the “Grapefruit League.” The shots of Alec Burleson (left) and Masyn Winn (right) were taken from seats in the first row behind home plate. Probably once-in-a-lifetime seating for us.
The Cardinals won on Friday, 8-4. Arenado drove in four runs.  What if they had traded him? Blah offense. Yesterday anemic hitting as they lost 3-2. Some good young pitching, however, Tekoah Roby and Kyle Leahy. There will be some competition for places in the Cardinals’ bullpen. Hitters are in pre-season form–sad.
Today we’ll see Washington Nationals back at Roger Dean Stadium. Not a cloud in the sky.
Nothing planned the last two days, which is fine with me. This place invites leisure: reading, writing and hiking.  I would like to remember getting some relaxation this trip. We also have reservations at a restaurant–Ke’ee— enthusiastically recommended by Glen and Joan Corlett, who are veterans of Spring Training.   We would highly recommend “The Cottage,” where we are staying. accommodations for two, but an adjacent room for one more.. Anna Current, a very gracious Vrbo host.  Here’s to one more Cardinals’ win!
*A Murphy bed is hinged at one end to store vertically against the wall, or inside a closet or cabinet. Since they often can be used as both a bed or a closet, Murphy beds are multifunctional furniture.
The Murphy bed is named after William Lawrence Murphy (1876–1957), president of the Murphy Bed and Door Company.[1][2]

Murphy applied for his first patents around 1900. According to legend, he was wooing an opera singer, but living in a one-room apartment in San Francisco, and the moral code of the time frowned upon a woman entering a man’s bedroom. Murphy’s invention converted his bedroom into a parlor, enabling him to entertain. [Wikipedia]

 

Jonah, the Anti-hero

In the next few weeks I am going to write about the biblical character of Jonah. I am working on a book about Jonah as a relevant, contemporary character, who reflects some of my issues as one who considered himself a mature believer.. 

If this subject interests you I recommend you read the story of  Jonah in the Hebrew Bible or refer to my summary in the following post.  I would welcome your comments since this is work in progress. — Bill

The Book of Jonah is found near the center of the Hebrew Bible and is a quick and valuable narrative for you, the reader. In the meantime, here is my synopsis.

  1. Jonah abandons his call from God  to preach in Nineveh and attempts escape by sea. A terrifying storm comes up and the sailors bail water and pray to their gods. They discover Jonah asleep in the hold and find out he is running from his God. Jonah volunteers to be thrown overboard. Though they are reluctant, they finally do throw Jonah into the sea. Immediately the storm calms and Jonah is consumed by a “whale” [ actually, a “sea monster’].
  2. Jonah prays for deliverance and promises to fulfill his obligation to preach to Nineveh. After three days in the sea monster, he is released on the coast of Assyria.
  3. Jonah tells the residents: “Forty day more and Nineveh shall be overthrown.” When the king and the citizens of the city hear Jonah’s message they immediately fast and pray to see if they can escape their fate. Indeed, God does forgive and spare Nineveh.
  4. Seeing no justice against the city, Jonah retreats, disillusioned by God’s failure to act. God offers a parable about God’s mercy, but Jonah is repulsed by the message, saying he would rather die than witness such mercy.
  5. God lectures Jonah, who remains resistant, preferring to die. In the end, God’s mercy overrides Jonah’s bitter judgment.

Jonah is an anti-hero, who fails to find his purpose in life. He is like a modern protagonist—adrift, alienated, and absurd.

Jonah’s xenophobia persists day. True believers do not always accept the triumph of mercy: that was the point of Jonah’s story. We do not comprehend the mercy of God on our enemies. We accept mercy only for ourselves and our kind. Jonah is timely satire to reflect on the hard-heartedness of righteous people.

Jonah’s orthodoxy is the theological equivalent of tribalism. It was my goal for four decades.  I never inhabited a whale (“sea monster”) or preached to a wicked city, but I always assumed my religious tribes, whatever they believed, were the arbiters of God’s truth. In my journey between spiritual homes, mine was always the orthodox one, the believers in “right teaching.” That was important to me. I was no prophet, but I aspired to be one. Like Jonah, orthodoxy was my downfall.

 

The Emergency Rescue Team

The Department of Education has had a target on its back, since the era of Ronald Reagan. “Eliminate  (the Department of) Education!” has been a mantra of Republicans since the 1980’s, a convenient target to reduce government spending. They found in Education a useful lamb to slaughter. Did anyone of them wonder if the public and charter schools received essential benefits from from Title I and Title II, benefits that states could not afford to take over? Not that I have heard.

As a veteran of twenty years’ teaching in high school, I can testify that Title I & II make a difference. The funding of Title I and Title II matter in the classroom. Why?

Teachers want to help every student in the classroom. In most states the normal number of students in a classroom is thirty, thirty-five in some, forty in a few. That is about ten or fifteen more students than any teacher can reach every day. Citizens who are not teachers do not understand this. They imagine a classroom where teachers lecture and write stuff on the whiteboard. How hard can that be?

Every student in the community comes into your classroom. Some of them come from homes with no books on the shelf.  Their parents do not read to them as young children, and they cannot help with homework, because they work two or three jobs. Many parents have not graduated from a high school or community college. These are typically the parents of students with individual needs. After you give a brief lesson on the Constitution or quadratic equations, you have to walk over to these students to see if they got it. Some of them have not. It is not for lack of intelligence;  it may be for an attention deficit or a learning disability or because they could not finish their homework.  These kids deserve an extra two minutes of help, not just words or numbers on a whiteboard.

This is where federal aid is crucial; those five or ten students over the expected 25 are flailing and panicking, stuck through no fault of their own. A Title I teacher walks over and discovers what the issue  is. Or a Title II special education teacher steps up to assist where whiteboard notations did not make sense enough for the student to move on. That is no fault of the teacher or the student, but merely the consequences of too many in classrooms and some unattended needs.

Some Americans have never confronted these issues, because someone in their family or someone in their immediate circle have jumped in to help them or their children. But there are too many students who seep through the cracks— especially the ones who labor from misdirection or no direction at all. Who reaches out to them ? The Title I or Title II teachers. They are the emergency rescue team.

If you don’t care about the  25 per cent or the quality of learning that would expand by the support of Title I or Title II, then of course you don’t consider the value  of the Department of Education.  Let the chips fall where they may. Your kids will sail through.

But if you believe in public schooling, where every kid deserves a chance to grow into capable citizens, then you should care about the demise of the Department of Education.

No one is going to carry the burden of the extra 5-10 students, if no Title I or Title II teachers are employed by the Department of Education. Unless your concern, your voice , your influence on the school board, which is responsible for all  30-40 students in a whole lot  of  classrooms. Teachers and unions can only protest so much before their pleas fall on deaf ears.  They are discounted as lacking  preparation or for self-interest.

You wouldn’t say that if you spent a week in any preK-12 classroom. Neither would the soul-less politicians who think they know public education. You would fight for the Department of Education. You would fight for all students, not just the socially enabled ones.  You would fight for right of all kids to be informed and responsible citizens.

 

 

 

Jesus and DEI

 “When evening comes, you say, ‘It will be fair weather, for the sky is red,’ and in the morning, ‘Today it will be stormy, for the sky is red and overcast.’ You know how to interpret the appearance of the sky, but you cannot interpret the signs [forecasts] of the times.[a]A wicked and adulterous generation looks for a sign [miracle], but none will be given it except the sign [past reflection] of Jonah.” Jesus then left them and went away.  (Matthew 16:1-4).

In this case “signs” are not ” miracles,” because Jesus refuses to perform one for the entertainment of the Pharisees. Signs are indications of something in the past as witnessed in the present, something we might have missed the first time we read about them? A “reflection of things past.”  What if the “sign of Jonah” is Jesus’s commentary on diversity, equality and inclusion?

Jesus was shaming the Pharisees for not realizing that Jesus himself was a sign of God’s message in the present.  Jesus was telling the Pharisees, rather cryptically, that, despite their status as the people chosen by God (the Israelites), they had missed the most important sign God had sent: the love of diversity, equality and inclusion. Stay with me now.

Obviously Jesus knew nothing of DEI, but he knew a lot about love, and he interpreted the story of Jonah to show God’s love for all nations. What did Jesus say in his first sermon?

The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free (Luke 4:18).

Understandable that the Pharisees did not get this.  After all, they were enslaved by the most powerful of pagan nations, the Romans. The Romans were the cruel adversaries of their Chosen nation.

Jonah had tried to run from his responsibility to preach to a pagan city. This is the part where Jonah gets swallowed  by a whale and, after three days, “spewed out” (literally) from his holding tank to do his job and preach to the Ninevites.  The Ninevites were famous for their cruelty and, definitely not “chosen” of God. Like the Romans, right?

The book of Jonah says that,  beside being a city of cruel pagans, Nineveh was huge: Now Nineveh was a very large city; it took three days to go through it (Jonah 3:3). Some commentators think this was an exaggeration, because what city is that big? But the point is 4 Jonah began by going a day’s journey into the city, proclaiming, “Forty more days and Nineveh will be overthrown.” The Ninevites believed God. A fast was proclaimed, and all of them, from the greatest to the least, put on sackcloth.(Jonah 3:3). Mass conversion of the most evil city of Assyria!

Clearly one of the most successful evangelical rallies in recorded history. Yet Jonah was not hoping that the pagans would be converted. When he found out that he was supposed to preach to the Ninevites, he had run away. He was prevented by a perfect storm and thrown overboard to appease the furious God.  The sea calmed and  along came a whale, etc.

To me, this is the funny part. In Jonah, Chapter 4, Jonah admits his real reason for running. He was familiar with the Torah. The Book of Exodus said: “you are a gracious God and merciful, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love, and ready to relent from punishing.” (Exodus 34:6-7). He was appalled that God was “gracious, merciful, and slow to anger.”

A rather strange attitude for the most successful evangelist in history!  Jonah says,”Now, Lord, take away my life, for it is better for me to die than to live.” Jonah was so revolted by the Ninevites that he preferred to die rather than live to see God’s mercy on such an evil city. Some prophet! This is why I call him “the prophet who couldn’t shoot straight.”

This is the crux of Jonah’s problem: tribal anger at the heathen, the “unclean,” and the assumption that God would judge them. He could not live with God’s mercy to pagans. As he finally explains, that was his original reason for taking a ship to the end of the known earth (Jonah 4: 1-2): prejudice and resentment.

Back to Jesus’s commentary on the “sign of Jonah.”  As he often does, Jesus connects the Hebrew Bible to his contemporary predicament: “The people of Nineveh will rise up at the judgment with this generation and condemn it, because they repented at the proclamation of Jonah and see, something greater than Jonah is here” (Matthew 12:41-42).

Jesus sides with the Ninevites in this story, not the Hebrew prophet, Jonah.. God continues to be “gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love, and ready to relent from punishing.” God shows his love of diversity, equality and inclusion through Jesus. God included , along with the “Chosen people,” the pagan city with the worst reputation.    God asserted the diversity and equality of the worst of the worst: because they repented at the proclamation of Jonah and see, says Jesus, meaning himself: something greater than Jonah is here” (Matthew 12:41-42).

This is not what an exceptional people want to hear: the pagans are now forgiven just like us. Everyone receives God’s favor. This is a long trip to DEI, but there is no question that the Book of Jonah was talking about the most despised group in biblical history. That God would have mercy on them with his DEI. “The sign of Jonah” is saying “mercy,”and so should we.

Are we going to die on this battlefield of exclusion like Jonah? Or accept the equal mercy of God on the diverse people of the world?

 

 

 

 

 

The Getaway

Now that we are returning from our seven-day cruise, we should call our ship, the “Been-There-Away” because most of the incredible management of 4500 cruisers is done. The 1400-person crew has masterfully boarded and discharged at least 3500 of those passengers every day.

This is my second cruise, so I should not have been surprised, but the ebb and flow of passengers did not strike me before. On “The Getaway.” we filed two-by-two, like Noah’s original cruise ship, while every Id was checked into the massive data base of passengers and the same routine coming back on board, according to schedule. A slightly less rigorous routine with the thirteen-odd dining rooms at dinner every night. The logistics of mass movement is incredible.

Some highlights of the voyage:

  •  Lunch at Fort Consolation in Honduras, where a nineteenth century fort was re-purposed as a restaurant about half a mile from the pier.The gun-ports  and  the cannons had been preserved, so I could capture our ship down the barrel of one cannon. The pork belly and plantains captured the essence of old Honduras. More authentic and less attractive, the garbage strewn and fractured sidewalks of the path just a few yards from the tourist village.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Intimate Taste of Mexican Tacos,” with the full range of chicken, pork and seafood tacos right in the middle of the local market. Surprise! We  had a Tequila workshop at the end with five rounds of sampling and quart and pint bottles for sale. We bought a pint.
  • Guided tour of the Chacchoben Mayan ruins, viewing the majestic pyramid-temples, hearing about the amazing calendar-mastery of tenth -century scientists, climbing one modest pyramid with steps enough for the feeble, as well as the athletic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • “The Million Dollar Quartet,”  a musical reunion of Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins, Johnny Cash and Gerry Lee-Lewis set in the 1950’s at Sun Records, based on the actual event. We had seen a similar performance at the Rep in St. Louis just before leaving, but these performers were so talented, the lighting so other-worldly, the music so varied that we attended two performance of the same production on ship.
  • “Broadway Unplugged,” adaptations of musicals “from Oklahoma to Hamilton,” in tempos and rhythms you’ve never heard before. Many performers were also stars of  “Million Dollar Quartet,” although their virtuosity in this performance was less than optimal.
  • Motown Revue by New Generation in the mid-ship Atrium on Thursday. The host and lead performer playfully entertained with numbers by Otis Redding, The Temptations, Smokey Robinson, and their contemporaries. Clapping, dancing, singing  gave expression to our collective soul.As with any cruise, the food was excellent, the service exemplary, the recreation satisfying. Probably overstepped my generational limits by taking the waterslide from the top. Ten seconds of gentle sliding bookending ten seconds of dark, terrifying spinning. Recovered the next day in the hot tub, with an hour of moderate boiling. Cannot over-emphasize the therapeutic effects of hot tubbing.

Lowlights include

  •  the hour-plus boarding of the same 4500 passengers.  Suggestion: Pay for the expedited boarding.
  • The  unlimited drink feature, which induces too much sour mouth and unnatural gas,  even hangover? There has got to be a compromise between paying individually for drinks and paying for all the drinks you can consume in seven days.  You have to buy an individual unlimited drink package, meaning you cannot buy someone else a drink at the same time you buy your own. For  two unlimited packages and shared alcoholism you can pay twice the price.
  • the conservation of wi-fi and the cost of multiple users.  You have no wi-fi in your cabin, unless you pay for it. Then you pay for each device you use, so you can’t use your phone and computer wi-fi together, and adding a second user requires more fees. The public wi-fi also has a trip-budgeted usage. I think this is a special cruel economy of Norwegian Cruise Lines. I don’t remember having such severe limitations on Princess.
  • the infirmary options: take a pain pill or see the doctor for $149.50 to get an over-the-counter antacid pill. Got mine from a pharmacy in Harvest Caye, Belize. Not ideal: the Directions for use in Spanish. I hoped I remembered the maximum dosage for Pepto-Bismol tablets.

At the Cafe Du Monde NO: Victoria, Sandra,Matt

I’ll give this cruise a three stars out of four, but some of the problems of all 2000+ capacity cruises — size and expense– are two stars out of  four. It’s all about the problems of expediting huge throngs of people. So what is amazing is also excruciating. It could be solved by going on high-priced, lower frustration cruises. You have to decide what you can afford. Did not have to go on a cruise to realize that.

L to R Sean, Spencer, and Jason

Victoria Witnessing the Illuminated Pyramid.

 

 

Nawlins

The Big Easy has the charm of a nineteenth century JazzTown.  We heard Jazz in

in Preservation Hall, a 63-year-old venue that looks like somebody’s basement, but rings with local bands playing for jazz innocents and sophisticates alike. Their final number was a jazz Jingle Bells, which I recorded, but could not upload to this fussy website.

 

We went to Frenchmen’s Bay to hear local club acts, like this one at the Spotted Cat.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We heard Jazz on the  street, like this one outside the Cafe Du Monde near the River.

 

Sign on Canal Street. Two things can be true at the same time, especially in Nawlins.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Victoria toasts with a Sazerac at the famous Icehouse in the French Quarter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A friendly alligator invites you to dine on Canal Street

 

 

Riding the St. Charles Streetcar

 

 

 

 

 

A high school jazzz band at the Riverwalk

Wise Journalism

 

The pundits of print, broadcast and internet journalism could learn something from the famous Wise Men. Two thousand years ago, they journeyed from the east to learn about the birth of a peasant child in a remote colony of the Roman colony. They demonstrated reverence for “the other,” an eagerness to listen to the voices of alien prophets, and a wariness of political entanglement.  Today’s partisan voices of various public media neglect their curiosity, their persistence, their openness to revelation.

To introduce readers, or remind them, of the story of the Wise Men, here are some highlights of the story:

The Wise Men, or Magi, were presumably astrologers in the sense that they found prophecies in the stars. In search of a prophesied king, they traveled from “the East,” and so were not of the Hebrew tradition. Arriving in Palestine, they went to the provincial authority, Herod, to find out local news of the “king” to be born. They disturbed King Herod, who was not prepared to give up his throne to anyone. Herod received the interpretation of the prophesied king from the priests and “teachers of the law,” who revealed the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem of Judea. Before the Wise Men went in search of the infant king, the King instructed them to inform him of what they found. The familiar scene follows: the Wise Men find the prophesied baby and present their gifts in worship. Then they are warned in a dream not to return to bring news to Herod, so they “returned to their country by another route.” (Matthew 2: 1-12)

The Wise Men understood:

  1. Discovery of truth is a journey
  2. Voices of “the other” (believers, prophets, priests, etc.) should be respected
  3.  Quests may bring you to strange places
  4.  Politics is a dangerous distraction

The fallout of the 2024 election threatens to polarize our community for another four years, unless we advocate for the wisdom of truth and reconciliation, like the restorative justice courts at the end of apartheid in South Africa.  Dialog begins in a public forum, where timely issues are addressed, and healing strategies proposed. To mediate the language of outrage and diatribe, we need voices with faith, affirmation of hope, and advocacy for love. These voices could be called “Belief-Ed”—Editorials about Belief.

If you would like Belief-Ed to be part of the offerings of the Post-Dispatch, take action and write to the Editors (editors@post-dispatch.com). The more who speak out, the more likely we will be heard. A once-a-week column could convert the dire messages of threat and despair to hope and reconciliation.

This is not to disqualify the necessary partisan voices of the Op-Ed pages, which deserve their exposure. We should be grateful for their insight and honesty. Their voices provide intelligent dialogue for sorting out political truth from deception.

However, we need reconciling voices to offset conflict and anger, recognizing that truth is not always partisan and honesty is not always divisive.

St. Louis has more than enough spokespersons of faith, such as:

Rev. Gabrielle NS Kennedy, MBA, MDiv (she/her/hers), Pastor of St. Luke AME Church, Founder & Executive Director, Faith HEALS.

Rabbi Daniel Bogard,  member of a rabbinic team at Central Reform Congregation,  Senior Rabbinic Fellow of the Shalom Hartman Institute, adjunct faculty at Eden Theological Seminary

Dr. Matthew Kaemingk, Richard John Mouw Assistant Professor of Faith and Public Life at Fuller Theological Seminary and Co-creator of the podcast, Zealots at the Gates.

Dr. Deborah Krause, President, Eden Theological Seminary and Professor of New Testament

Rabbi Susan Talve and Carla Mae Streeter, OP, authors of Avoiding the Sin of Certitude: A Rabbi and a Theologian in Feminine Interfaith Conversations from Disputation to Dialog

 Other diverse voices of faith from the Inter-faith Partnership, https://interfaithstl.org/

Many more than I can mention here. Belief-Ed would speak to the differences among our faiths as well as our consensus.

Belief-Ed would help us feel less cynical about our future.  Why shouldn’t these voices receive attention in the Post-Dispatch and other media outlets with a wide audience? Where can secular citizens hear them? What about others who are isolated on denominational islands?

When I was a teen-ager, our local newspaper, The Long Island Press, had a maxim atop its editorial page: “Without a vision, the people perish” [Proverbs 29:18]. The Post-Dispatch could earn the distinction of offering a vision, if the Opinion editors reserved a place for faith and reconciliation among their editorial voices.

Advocate for Belief-Ed!

Your Kingdom Come

My Theology

“Your kingdom come; Your will be done

On earth as  in heaven.”

(All Translations from the New Zealand Prayer Book).

The kingdom of God is coming, but  the kingdoms of earth are not subject to God. We would not pray for what we already have. We pray for God’s kingdom because that perfection exists only with  “God” or “Lord’ or “Mother/ Father.” Where is heaven ? I surely don’t know. But we are praying for its  coming. It is not already here.

C. S. Lewis, in his trilogy that begins with Out of the Silent Planet, imagines that Earth is a singular planet in the Solar System that is separated from God. Lewis would be the first to call the trilogy fiction, not theology, but his ideas are intriguing experiments in understanding a good Creation fallen and violence threatening to destroy it.

The idea of Earth being a singular “silent” planet develops from the imagined planet being disconnected from the rest of the planetary beings. It is “silent” (called “Thulcandra”) because God has been rejected in favor of a secular civilization.  The voice of Earth no longer communicates with the other planetary presiding spirits.

This is a crude theology that tries to account for a good Creation in the midst of conflict and violence, a concern that humanity is on a path to destroy itself. I am optimistic about the wonders of science, art, and nature, but not about the ruling powers that threaten to conscript them.  I think this would have been Lewis’ view of the predicament of Western civilization.

“Romanticism,” at least the Wordsworthian version, seems more optimistic of the perfectability of humankind.  The unspoiled world of Nature will rule over the spoiled civilization so that humankind’s  best impulses will eventually rule.  Romanticism is optimistic, at least in the present age. Romanticism does not believe we are a fallen world that God must rescue.

“Our Father in heaven

hallowed be your name.

The prayer is addressed to a male figure, but I assume that God is not gendered, because it would be a limitation of God’s identity. We worship  God when we say “hallowed.”

“Your kingdom come; Your will be done

On earth as  in heaven.”

The prayer expresses a hope, but not a confidence, that God will control our destiny.  The primary distinction comes from “on earth as in heaven.” We pray for the reign of God, but it is not yet fulfilled.

” Give us today our daily bread”

Some of us are not in need of tangible bread, but we recall that Jesus said “I am the Bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry”(John 6:35). That bread we all need.

“Forgive us our sins as we forgive those who sin against us.”

To me, this is the core of the Good News: we are forgiven our shortcomings, but that entails forgiving our neighbor. I don’t think of this as conditional. God forgives us regardless of what we do.  But receiving the “Bread of Life” could entail forgiving, because God forgives those who offend us.

“Save us from the time of trial and deliver us from evil.”

I find this line comforting. To me it says that God may spare us from attack, temptation,  bad judgment, and the consequences.  Most likely, God will allow what is necessary for our deliverance from evil, not immunity from necessary trials.

“For the kingdom, the power, and the glory are yours,

now and forever.”

The conclusion tells me that power and glory belong to God, and that is how God plans to finish the story of earth. The kingdom is coming.

I find this prayer more dependent and responsive to the choices of humans, than the ideals of Romanticism.  Both Romanticism and Christianity celebrate the freedom of humans to act responsibly, but only Christianity connects that freedom to the consequences of human failure.  Christians rely on their hope for the kingdom of God and their actions in the quest of the kingdom . Forgiveness is  necessary for this kingdom to come–both God’s and God’s creatures. But come it will.

We stand halfway between the kingdom coming and the kingdom come. We believe that God will assume “the power and the glory forever.”

This tension between the kingdom and the kingdom coming defines Christianity’s expectations and its distinction from Romanticism.

 

 

 

Fallacies of Christian Nationalism

The Pharisees backed Jesus into a corner. What would he say about paying taxes to Caesar? Would he comply with the edict of the hated Romans? Or side with the Jewish tax resisters and put himself in political danger? In a skillful reframing of this impossible dilemma, Jesus said,

“Show me the coin used for the tax. …

Whose head is this and, and whose title?”

They answered, “The emperor’s”

“Give therefore to the emperor the things that are the emperor’s

And to God, things that are God’s.” (Matthew 22: 20-21)

With this confounding answer Jesus separated the taxes of Rome from the worship of the God of Israel, historically separating church from state. Traditional Hebrew people never again had a government they could call call their own. They lived under secular governments for the rest of their history.

Even today Jewish people live under democracies that separate faith from their religion. The Zionists,  who seek to restore that separation in Israel, are only a tiny subset of the Orthodox tradition, a minority faction itself.

So why do Christian nationalists attempt to break down the separation of church and state, when everything in the Christian Bible and subsequent history agrees with Jesus’ pronouncement? Why do we hear the claim that the United States is a “Christian nation,” founded by Christians and justifiably restored to the rule of Christians today?

U.S. History testifies that traditional Christians did not found the nation. The signers of the Declaration of Independence were Protestants, but including many Deists, Quakers, and Unitarians, who did not identify with mainline Christian believers.

The faith of Deists and Unitarians relied heavily on Enlightenment philosophy, distinguished from the more traditional faith of biblical Christians. Religious toleration was commonly held by the signers, yet not only Christians, in the sense that conservative Christians think of themselves today.

As for the doctrine of separation of church and state, most Deists, like Thomas Jefferson, took a strong stand against the state observance of private faiths. As President Jefferson said in a letter to a Baptist group in Danbury, CT.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between church and state. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-founding-fathers-religious-wisdom/

Not only Jesus, but the signers of the Declaration of Independence denied the legitimacy of a “Christian nation” today. Where do the Christian nationalists find the authority for their claims? Is it because they persist in the doctrine of national “exceptionalism:”  “a belief that a species, country, society, institution, movement, individual, or time period is “exceptional” (i.e., unusual or extraordinary).”?

Wasn’t this exceptionalist doctrine the reason for slavery, which the South called its “peculiar institution,” because it defied all religious and moral traditions? That resulted in Civil War. Exceptionalism has caused nothing but strife and death in our history.

Modern autocratic governments receive the authority of churches to maintain power.  The approval of the Russian Orthodox church justified  the Soviet government’s war against sovereign states like Ukraine. Viktor Orban, autocratic Premier of Hungary, refers to his government as a “Christian Democracy.”  Modern autocracies, like Saudi Arabia and Iran, have established Muslim sects as official religions with no tolerance for Christianity.

Religion and history have shown the failure of blurring the lines between church and state. Christian nationalists should take those lessons to heart. They should honor the authority of Jesus, the Founding Fathers, and U.S. history and pay respect to the rights of other faiths to be equal under the law.

 

.